CitePulse · Visibility forecasting
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexityGrokDeepSeek

Stop guessing.
Start forecasting.

CitePulse forecasts your citation rate across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok and DeepSeek, grounded in your real citation history. No guesswork, no inflated numbers. Just an honest read on which way you are trending, and what to do about it.

Grounded in your measured history · 7 / 14 / 30-day forecasts · re-run every day
You can measure today. You cannot see tomorrow.

An honest read on where you are heading.

Tools can tell you ChatGPT cited you 34% of the time this week. None tell you whether that number is climbing, flat, or quietly slipping. CitePulse does, from data that is actually yours.

6AI engines checked and forecast every day
7/14/30Day forecast horizons, each confidence-scored
DailyRe-run and re-graded against what really happened
ZeroMade-up numbers. Every figure traces to your measured data
How it works

A forecast you can
actually trust.

CitePulse builds its forecast from your measured citation history, the same numbers on your dashboard, not from a model’s imagination. When your visibility is flat, it says flat. When it is climbing, it shows how fast and how sure.

1
We measure
Every day, your prompts are checked across all six AI engines and verified, so the citation data is clean
2
We forecast
CitePulse projects each engine forward 7, 14 and 30 days with an honest confidence range, and re-runs daily
3
We explain and act
An agent swarm maps the signals behind the forecast and surfaces the one action most likely to move it
DailyIt checks, forecasts and re-grades on its own, every day. Low-confidence calls are flagged, never shipped silently.
CitePulse · Forecast
Live
+0%projected uplift, next 30 days
CitePulse simulation · 300+ agents · grounded in your live citation graph
today
Prompt shift detected 3 weeks early. Move now, before the leaderboard does.
By engine

See exactly where the gap is.

The current citation rate and trend for each of the six AI engines, side by side. Saturated on Claude, rising on Perplexity, weak on Gemini, so you know where to spend the effort.

ClaudeNear-saturated
61%citation rate
ChatGPTClimbing
38%citation rate
PerplexityClimbing fast
29%citation rate
GrokHolding
17%citation rate
GeminiSlipping
12%citation rate
DeepSeekEmerging
9%citation rate
What changed this week

Catch a slip the week it happens.

Measured citation gains and losses, pulled straight from your check history. Real events, not narrative, so nothing creeps up on you.

Newly cited on Perplexityfor “emergency plumber”
Perplexity
Citation rate up 4 points on ChatGPTweek over week, measured
ChatGPT
Lost citation on Geminifor “best plumber near me”
Gemini
New competitor source indexednow mapped in your graph
Claude
Inside CitePulse

Everything that makes a forecast trustworthy.

A plain-English verdict

One read at the top: holding steady, climbing, declining or near-saturated. No chart-reading required.

The forecast cone

Nine weeks of measured history flowing into a 7, 14 and 30-day projection, with a confidence band that widens honestly when the data is thin.

The Simulation Map

An agent swarm maps the entities, competitors and sources behind your visibility into a live knowledge graph, so the forecast is never a black box.

Do this next

The single highest-impact move, with the effort it takes. We never quote a made-up lift number. We measure the real impact after you ship.

Accuracy you can prove

Every forecast is graded against what actually happened, so the model stays honest over time and you can see its track record.

Runs every day

It checks, forecasts and re-grades on its own, every day. The number is always current, never stale.

Why it matters

Real numbers, or we say we’re not sure.

Most AI tools hand you a confident-sounding guess. CitePulse reads your measured citation history and tells you exactly which way each engine is moving, with a number you can trace.

The generic AI guess
  • “Your visibility may increase over the next 14 days.”
  • “Consider adding more content to improve citations.”
  • “Competitors may be affecting your rankings.”
Invented · no specifics · no confidence · no data backing
With CitePulse
  • “Climbing on ChatGPT. Projected 38% to 41% over 14 days (78% confidence).”
  • “Slipping on Gemini. You lost a citation for “best plumber near me”last week.”
  • “Do this next: add FAQ schema to /services. We measure the real impactafter you ship.”
Measured · traceable · confidence-scored · graded against reality
Connected suite

CitePulse doesn’t work alone.

Every Outercite product feeds the same measured data and knowledge graph, so the forecast gets sharper the more of the suite you run.

Vericite

Verification

Feeds verified citations into the forecast. Only dual-model confirmed data is counted.

Citescout

Competitor tracking

Competitor activity enriches the Simulation Map: who is gaining, where, and why.

Citezens

Agents

The agent swarm that maps the signals behind every forecast into your knowledge graph.

Citerank

Authority

Authority scores that give the forecast context beyond raw citation counts.

Questions, answered

The honest answers.

Every AI tool I have tried hallucinates numbers.

That is exactly why CitePulse is built the way it is. The forecast comes from your measured citation history, not a language model guessing, and every forecast is graded against what actually happened. When we do not have enough data to be sure, we say so instead of inventing a number.

How is this different from Profound or Otterly?

They monitor. They hand you a dashboard of what already happened. CitePulse is the only one that forecasts where you are heading, grounded in real data, and points you at the action most likely to move it.

Where do the numbers come from?

Your measured citation rate, the same numbers on your dashboard. The forecast is anchored to them, so CitePulse and your dashboard always agree.

See where you are heading, before it gets there

Stop reacting late.
See your forecast.

Get an honest read on which way your AI visibility is trending across all six engines, grounded in your real citation history, and the one move most likely to change it.