Supported recommendation
See the gap, evidence and proposed work before deciding to proceed.
Ask the assistant what deserves attention, review a supported recommendation and carry approved work through publication. Then compare the answers that follow.
Teams need to know which gap matters, why it matters and what must happen next. Outercite keeps the proposed change, approval, publication and follow-up evidence in one record.
Every action begins with a real answer and ends with a review of what happened next.
Start with a question where another brand appears and yours does not.
Original answerDefine the proposed change, supporting evidence and reason for prioritising it.
Priority briefRecord the decision, submitted URL and the work that went live.
Publication recordCrawl the page, save the evidence and compare subsequent AI answers.
Outcomes reviewThe assistant can explain the opportunity while the original answer, proposed work and later checks remain open beside it.
See the gap, evidence and proposed work before deciding to proceed.
Keep who approved the work and the submitted page URL in the record.
Check the published page against the brief, then review later AI answers.
Begin with a real opportunity and the answers that make it worth investigating.
Show what needs approval, what was published and what remains open.
Compare later checks with the starting point without claiming more than the evidence shows.
No automatic publishing is implied. Your team controls approval and publication, or Concierge can help carry agreed work within the scope you approve.
The publication record stores the submitted URL. Outercite can crawl that page, check it against the approved brief and save the resulting evidence.
Yes. The assistant can investigate monitored gaps, explain why they matter and help prioritise the next supported action.
Start with a free visibility check, then use Outercite to investigate, act and review what changes.